Opinia CRJM cu privire la proiectul de lege cu privire la lichidarea Curții de Apel Bender

Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) pledează pentru optimizarea hărții judiciare din Republica Moldova, elaborând recomandări specifice în acest domeniu în Studiul cu privire la optimizarea hărții judiciare din Republica Moldova.

În acest context, CRJM salută elaborarea de către Guvern a proiectului de lege nr. 244 cu privire la modificarea anexei nr. 3 la Legea nr. 514-XIII din 6 iulie 1995 privind organizarea judecătorească, care propune lichidarea Curții de Apel Bender, considerând acest proiect un prim pas în vederea inițierii procesului de optimizare a hărții judiciare din Republica Moldova. Totuși, proiectul are unele carențe care ar putea crea impedimente la aplicarea acestuia, cât și periclita buna implementare a Strategiei de reformare a sectorului justiției. În acest context, CRJM a expediat Comisiei Juridice, Numiri și Imunități, la 8 iulie curent, Obiecțiile și propunerile CRJM la proiectul de lege.

Hotărârile Curții Penale Internaționale

The International Criminal Court (ICC), governed by the Rome Statute, is the first permanent, treaty based, international criminal court established to help end impunity for the perpetrators of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community.
The ICC is an independent international organisation, and is not part of the United Nations system. Its seat is at The Hague in the Netherlands. Although the Court’s expenses are funded primarily by States Parties, it also receives voluntary contributions from governments, international organisations, individuals, corporations and other entities.
Moldova is the 114th state to ratify the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court (2011).

Hotărârile și Opiniile consultative ale Curții Internaționale de Justiție

The International Court of Justice (commonly referred to as the World Court or ICJ) is the primary judicial branch of the United Nations. It is based in the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands. Its main functions are to settle legal disputes submitted to it by states and to provide advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by duly authorized international branches, agencies, and the UN General Assembly.

Hotărârile Curții Inter-Americane a Drepturilor Omului

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is an autonomous judicial institution based in the city of San José, Costa Rica. Together with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, it makes up the human rights protection system of the Organization of American States (OAS), which serves to uphold and promote basic rights and freedoms in the Americas.
Under the Convention, cases can be referred to the Court by either the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights or a state party. In contrast to the European human rights system, individual citizens of the OAS member states are not allowed to take cases directly to the Court.

The United States signed but never ratified the Convention.

Hotărârile Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene

The Court of Justice interprets EU law to make sure it is applied in the same way in all EU countries. It also settles legal disputes between EU governments and EU institutions. Individuals, companies or organisations can also bring cases before the Court if they feel their rights have been infringed by an EU institution.
The Répertoire de jurisprudence (Digest of case-law) is a systematic collection of the summaries of judgments and orders of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal delivered or made since they commenced their activities.
The classification scheme, initially subdivided into eight parts, for the period 1954 to 2009, has been reworked following the changes brought about by the Treaty of Lisbon into a plan in nine parts, for the case-law as from 2010. References between the two classification schemes make it easy to move from one to the other.

Hotărârile CtEDO (HUDOC)

The HUDOC database provides access to the European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber judgment, chambers and committees, decisions, cases reported, advisory opinions and legal summaries and as well as notes extracted information on case law), of the European Commission (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions). To search the database available HUDOC many operational fields:
• text
• Language
• the respondent State
• Date
• conclusion
• Other filters

Decizii asupra cererilor de recurs în interesul legii

Appeal on points of law is an extraordinary appeal that ensures consistent interpretation and application of criminal law and criminal procedure throughout the country.
Decisions are adopted by the Criminal Justice Panel of the Supreme Court reasoned on reasoned request of the:
• President of the Supreme Court,
• President of the Criminal Justice Panel of the Supreme Court.
• Attorney General.
• President of the Bar.
Decisions on applications for appeal on points of law are mandatory from the date of delivery and have no effect on decisions already settled by final judgment.
Legal basis: art. 465¹-465³ of the Criminal Procedure Code

Hotărârile explicative ale Curţii Supreme de Justiţie

For a correct and uniform application of the law, The Supreme Court of Justice generalizes ex officio case-law in certain categories and adopts explanatory decisions on the correct application of the rules of law and fair settlement of civil cases.

Explanatory decisions are adopted by the Plenum of the Supreme Court.The application of the judgments is optional for the courts.

Legal basis: Art. 1 of. 2 and art. 16 letter. "C" of the Law. 789 of 26.03.1996 on the Supreme Court
• Art. 17 Code of Civil Procedure
• Art. 7 Code of Criminal Procedure