{"id":21717,"date":"2020-09-11T08:00:27","date_gmt":"2020-09-11T05:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=21717"},"modified":"2020-09-14T12:32:45","modified_gmt":"2020-09-14T09:32:45","slug":"moldova-la-curtea-europeana-a-drepturilor-omului-peste-600-de-violari-in-23-de-ani-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/moldova-la-curtea-europeana-a-drepturilor-omului-peste-600-de-violari-in-23-de-ani-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Moldova la Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului: peste 600 de viol\u0103ri \u00een 23 de ani"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cu 23 de ani \u00een urm\u0103, la 12 septembrie 1997, Republica Moldova a devenit parte la Conven\u021bia European\u0103 pentru Drepturile Omului (CEDO). Prin aderarea la CEDO, Republica Moldova s-a angajat s\u0103 respecte drepturile garantate de aceasta \u0219i a recunoscut jurisdic\u021bia Cur\u021bii Europene a Drepturilor Omului (CtEDO).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) a elaborat o <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/CRJM-23ani-CtEDO.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sintez\u0103 a viol\u0103rilor constatate de CtEDO \u00een privin\u021ba Republicii Moldova din momentul ader\u0103rii la Conven\u021bie<\/a>, pentru a spori nivelul de informare al speciali\u0219tilor despre activitatea CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti, a facilita aplicarea standardelor CtEDO la nivel na\u021bional, precum \u0219i pentru prevenirea viol\u0103rilor similare \u00een viitor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Astfel, \u00een perioada 12 Septembrie 1997 &#8211; 30 iunie 2020, CtEDO a pronun\u021bat 461 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri, \u00een care a constatat 616 viol\u0103ri ale CEDO de c\u0103tre Republica Moldova.<\/p>\n<p>Cel mai des \u00eenc\u0103lcate drepturi sunt:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>dreptul la un proces echitabil (Art.6 CEDO) &#8211; 200 de viol\u0103ri (32,5%);<\/li>\n<li>interzicerea torturii (Art.3 CEDO) &#8211; 142 de viol\u0103ri (23%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la libertate \u015fi siguran\u021b\u0103 (Art. 5 CEDO) &#8211; 92 de viol\u0103ri (15%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la un recurs efectiv (Art. 13 CEDO) &#8211; 60 de viol\u0103ri (9,7%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la respectarea vie\u021bii private \u0219i de familie (Art. 8 CEDO) &#8211; 30 de viol\u0103ri (4,9%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la libertatea de exprimare (Art. 10 CEDO) &#8211; 19 viol\u0103ri (3,1%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Cel mai des \u00eent\u00e2lnite tipuri de viol\u0103ri sunt:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>neexecutarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti &#8211; 68 de viol\u0103ri (11 %);<\/li>\n<li>casarea neregulamentar\u0103 a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti irevocabile &#8211; 52 de viol\u0103ri (8,4%);<\/li>\n<li>deten\u021bia \u00een condi\u021bii proaste &#8211; 46 de viol\u0103ri (7,5%);<\/li>\n<li>investigarea defectuoas\u0103 a maltrat\u0103rii \u0219i a deceselor \u2013 45 de viol\u0103ri (7,3%);<\/li>\n<li>maltratarea \u2013 31 de viol\u0103ri (5%);<\/li>\n<li>lipsirea de libertate contrar legisla\u021biei na\u021bionale &#8211; 28 de viol\u0103ri (4,5%);<\/li>\n<li>arestarea nemotivat\u0103 \u2013 27 de viol\u0103ri (4,4%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sinteza a fost elaborat\u0103 \u00een baza studierii jurispruden\u021bei CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti disponibile pe <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng#{%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22]}\">pagina web a CtEDO<\/a>. Viol\u0103rile au fost sistematizate \u00eentr-un tabel, \u00een func\u021bie de articole \u0219i tipuri de viol\u0103ri constatate de CEDO. \u00cen tabel, la fiecare categorie, sunt men\u021bionate toate hot\u0103r\u00e2rile \u00een care a fost constatat\u0103 o violare de acela\u0219i tip.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cencep\u00e2nd cu 2010, CRJM a analizat activitatea CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti pentru fiecare an: <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/raport.activ_.ctedo_.2010.28.01.2011.pdf\">2010<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Raport.activ_.ctedo_.2011.fin_1.pdf\">2011<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Raport.activ_.ctedo_.2012.20.02.2013-11.pdf\">2012<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Hot-CtEDO-2013.pdf\">2013<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/05-Nota-Analitica-Ianuarie-2015-1.pdf\">2014<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/CRJM-NA-CtEDO-2015-1.pdf\">2015<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/NA-CRJM-CtEDO-2016-ro-final-web-1.pdf\">2016<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/CRJM-NA-Activitatea-CtEDO-2017.pdf\">2017<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/NA-CEDO-2018-fin.pdf\">2018<\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Nota-analitica-CtEDO-2019.pdf\">2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Documentul este disponibil \u00een limba rom\u00e2n\u0103 la: <\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 1px solid #CCC; border-width: 1px; margin-bottom: 5px; max-width: 100%;\" src=\"\/\/www.slideshare.net\/slideshow\/embed_code\/key\/BB1EgaMgMzHSEJ\" width=\"668\" height=\"714\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"> <\/iframe><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-bottom: 5px;\">\u00a0<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cu 23 de ani \u00een urm\u0103, la 12 septembrie 1997, Republica Moldova a devenit parte la Conven\u021bia European\u0103 pentru Drepturile Omului (CEDO). Prin aderarea la CEDO, Republica Moldova s-a angajat s\u0103 respecte drepturile garantate de aceasta \u0219i a recunoscut jurisdic\u021bia Cur\u021bii Europene a Drepturilor Omului (CtEDO). Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) a elaborat [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":21725,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21717"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21717"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21717\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21795,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21717\/revisions\/21795"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}