{"id":21202,"date":"2020-06-24T09:28:07","date_gmt":"2020-06-24T06:28:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=21202"},"modified":"2020-06-24T14:07:00","modified_gmt":"2020-06-24T11:07:00","slug":"infografic-increderea-populatiei-si-avocatilor-in-justitia-din-republica-moldova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/infografic-increderea-populatiei-si-avocatilor-in-justitia-din-republica-moldova\/","title":{"rendered":"Infografic\/\/\u00cencrederea popula\u021biei \u0219i avoca\u021bilor \u00een justi\u021bia din Republica Moldova"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Cum a evoluat \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bia din Republica Moldova din 2008 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2019? Ce percep\u021bie au avut cet\u0103\u021benii \u0219i avoca\u021bii despre independen\u021ba judec\u0103torilor din \u021bar\u0103? R\u0103spunsurile la aceste \u00eentreb\u0103ri sunt reprezentate grafic de c\u0103tre Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) \u00een baza analizei <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/ipp.md\/sectiuni\/barometrul-opiniei-publice\/\"><strong>Barometrului Opiniei Publice din 2008 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2019<\/strong><\/a><strong> \u0219i a sondajului \u201e<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/2018-CRJM-Sondaj-Independenta-justitiei-RO.pdf\"><strong>Percep\u0163ia avoca\u0163ilor cu privire la independen\u0163a, eficien\u0163a \u0219i responsabilitatea justi\u0163iei din Republica Moldova<\/strong><\/a><strong>\u201d. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cencep\u00e2nd cu anul 2010, tendin\u021ba general\u0103 a fost una de sc\u0103dere a \u00eencrederii popula\u021biei \u00een justi\u021bie, cu scurte reveniri \u00een preajma sau urmare a scrutinelor parlamentare din 2010, 2014, alegerii pre\u0219edin\u021bilor Republicii Moldova din 2012, precum \u0219i urmare a schimb\u0103rii guvern\u0103rii \u00een anul 2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Punctele minime de \u00eencredere \u00een justi\u021bie \u00een istoria m\u0103sur\u0103rilor au fost \u00eenregistrate pe fundalul crizelor politice din 2015-2016 \u0219i furtului miliardului din sistemul bancar, dezv\u0103luit public \u00een anul 2014.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Principalele concluzii privind \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bie \u00een Republica Moldova sunt:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Peste 6 ani de la demararea \u00een 2011 a reformelor \u00een justi\u021bie, \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bie era mai sc\u0103zut\u0103 ca la \u00eenceputul acestora, suger\u00e2nd c\u0103 reformele nu au avut efectul a\u0219teptat.<\/li>\n<li>\u00cencrederea \u00een justi\u021bie a crescut \u00een preajma alegerilor \u0219i a schimb\u0103rii guvern\u0103rii \u00een 2009 \u0219i 2019 \u0219i a sc\u0103zut considerabil dup\u0103 alegeri;<\/li>\n<li>Circa jum\u0103tate din cet\u0103\u021benii chestiona\u021bi consider\u0103 c\u0103 justi\u021bia trateaz\u0103 \u00een mod egal justi\u021biabilii, indiferent de gen \u0219i v\u00e2rst\u0103;<\/li>\n<li>Circa o treime din responden\u021bi consider\u0103 c\u0103 justi\u021bia se face egal indiferent de func\u021bie, apartenen\u021b\u0103 politic\u0103 sau avere;<\/li>\n<li>At\u00e2t \u00een 2018, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een 2019 circa 60% din cei chestiona\u021bi nu erau siguri c\u0103 judec\u0103torii le vor face dreptate;<\/li>\n<li>Doar 29% din avoca\u021bii chestiona\u021bi \u00een 2018 considerau c\u0103 legea se aplic\u0103 \u00een mod egal fa\u0163\u0103 de to\u0163i justi\u0163iabilii;<\/li>\n<li>\u00cen 2018, doar 17% din avoca\u021bi considerau c\u0103 judec\u0103torii sunt independen\u021bi \u015fi 35% considerau c\u0103 solu\u0163iile judec\u0103torilor sunt echitabile \u015fi adoptate f\u0103r\u0103 influen\u0163e din exterior;<\/li>\n<li>Avoca\u0163ii consider\u0103 c\u0103 solu\u021biile judec\u0103torilor sunt cel mai des influen\u0163ate de politicieni, procurori, al\u021bi judec\u0103tori \u0219i Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00cencrederea \u00een justi\u021bie este determinat\u0103 de urm\u0103torii factori:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Interdependen\u021ba \u00eencrederii \u00een justi\u021bie \u0219i \u00eencrederea \u00een alte institu\u021bii ale statului. Dac\u0103 scade \u00eencrederea popula\u021biei \u00een tot ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 stat, se va reduce inevitabil \u0219i \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bie;<\/li>\n<li>Fonul mediatic \u00een jurul justi\u021biei. Modul \u0219i volumul \u00een care anumite evenimente legate de justi\u021bie sunt mediatizate la fel modeleaz\u0103 percep\u021bia publicului. Cu c\u00e2t mai des media difuzeaz\u0103 subiecte legate de justi\u021bie, cu at\u00e2t impactul asupra percep\u021biei publicului e de mai lung\u0103 durat\u0103.<\/li>\n<li>Experien\u021ba proprie sau a cercului social restr\u00e2ns al cet\u0103\u021beanului. Experien\u021ba unei persoane care a fost parte la o cauz\u0103 aflat\u0103 pe rolul instan\u021belor de judecat\u0103, influen\u021beaz\u0103 puternic opinia acesteia despre justi\u021bie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Datele cu privire la \u00eencrederea joas\u0103 a popula\u021biei cu privire la justi\u021bie ar trebui s\u0103 determine sistemul judec\u0103toresc \u0219i al\u021bi factori de decizie relevan\u021bi s\u0103 ia m\u0103suri urgente axate pe sporirea calit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i echit\u0103\u021bii actului de justi\u021bie.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Infograficul privind \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bia din Republica Moldova este disponibil\u00een limba <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/increderea-in-justitia-din-Republica-Moldova-2.pdf\">rom\u00e2n\u0103\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>\u0219i <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Confidence-in-judiciary-2.pdf\">englez\u0103<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Acest infografic este elaborat \u00een cadrul proiectului \u201e<em>Suport institu\u021bional pentru dezvoltarea organiza\u021biei<\/em>\u201d, implementat de CRJM \u0219i finan\u021bat de Suedia. Opiniile exprimate apar\u021bin CRJM \u0219i nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar pozi\u021bia Suediei.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 1px solid #CCC; border-width: 1px; margin-bottom: 5px; max-width: 100%;\" src=\"\/\/www.slideshare.net\/slideshow\/embed_code\/key\/UAL4pIcgyMCZe\" width=\"668\" height=\"714\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"> <\/iframe><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-bottom: 5px;\">\u00a0<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cum a evoluat \u00eencrederea \u00een justi\u021bia din Republica Moldova din 2008 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2019? Ce percep\u021bie au avut cet\u0103\u021benii \u0219i avoca\u021bii despre independen\u021ba judec\u0103torilor din \u021bar\u0103? R\u0103spunsurile la aceste \u00eentreb\u0103ri sunt reprezentate grafic de c\u0103tre Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) \u00een baza analizei Barometrului Opiniei Publice din 2008 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2019 \u0219i a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":21271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21202"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21202"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21272,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21202\/revisions\/21272"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}