{"id":20426,"date":"2020-04-13T16:18:49","date_gmt":"2020-04-13T13:18:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=20426"},"modified":"2020-04-17T10:28:43","modified_gmt":"2020-04-17T07:28:43","slug":"apel-public-influentarea-curtii-constitutionale-si-acceptarea-influentarii-de-catre-judecatorii-ei-este-inadmisibila","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/apel-public-influentarea-curtii-constitutionale-si-acceptarea-influentarii-de-catre-judecatorii-ei-este-inadmisibila\/","title":{"rendered":"APEL PUBLIC- Influen\u021barea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u0219i acceptarea influen\u021b\u0103rii de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torii ei este inadmisibil\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Organiza\u021biile societ\u0103\u021bii civile regret\u0103 discu\u021biile pre\u0219edintelui Republicii Moldova cu pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu privire la o cauz\u0103 examinat\u0103 de Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103. De asemenea, suntem \u00eengrijora\u021bi c\u0103 pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a \u00eencercat s\u0103 se justifice \u00een fa\u021ba pre\u0219edintelui \u021b\u0103rii \u0219i \u0219i-a exprimat opinia cu privire la cauza examinat\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 la emiterea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii Cur\u021bii. Un asemenea comportament \u0219tirbe\u0219te grav imaginea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale. Solicit\u0103m plenului Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale s\u0103 ia o decizie cu privire la aceast\u0103 situa\u021bie \u0219i s\u0103 adopte m\u0103surile care se impun pentru a preveni astfel de situa\u021bii \u00een viitor. De asemenea, solicit\u0103m Pre\u0219edintelui Republicii Moldova, Igor DODON, s\u0103 \u00eenceteze orice ac\u021biuni de ingerin\u021b\u0103 \u00een activitatea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La 2 aprilie 2020, Guvernul Republicii Moldova \u0219i-a asumat r\u0103spunderea pentru adoptarea Legii nr. 56 privind instituirea unor m\u0103suri de sus\u021binere a cet\u0103\u021benilor \u0219i a activit\u0103\u021bii de \u00eentreprinz\u0103tor \u00een perioada st\u0103rii de urgen\u021b\u0103 \u0219i modificarea unor acte normative. Mai mul\u021bi deputa\u021bi au sesizat Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 (sesiz\u0103rile <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=sesizari&#038;docid=1257&#038;l=ro\">nr. 49a\/2020<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=sesizari&#038;docid=1259&#038;l=ro\">nr. 51a\/2020<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=sesizari&#038;docid=1258&#038;l=ro\">nr. 52a\/2020<\/a> \u0219i <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=sesizari&#038;docid=1260&#038;l=ro\">nr. 53a\/2020<\/a>). Acestea contest\u0103, printre altele, la constitu\u021bionalitatea prevederilor legii care se refer\u0103 la modificarea politicii bugetar-fiscale prin introducerea unui alt mecanism de calculare a taxelor locale pentru extragerea resurselor minerale utile, prelungirea \u00eenlesnirilor la v\u00e2nzarea produselor din tutun \u0219i schimbarea modului de percepere a accizelor \u00een activitatea magazinelor duty-free. La <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=decizii&#038;docid=783&#038;l=ro\">9 aprilie 2020<\/a> Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a admis sesiz\u0103rile, stabilind examinarea acestora \u00een fond pentru ast\u0103zi, <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/calendarview.php?l=ro&#038;idc=59&#038;id=1815&#038;t=\/Activitatea-jurisdictionala\/Agenda-Curtii\/Examinarea-sesizarilor-nr-49a2020-nr-51a2020-nr-52a20-i-53a2020\">13 aprilie 2020<\/a> \u0219i decis suspendarea ac\u021biunea \u00eentregii Legii nr. 56.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La 10 aprilie 2020, pre\u0219edintele Republicii Moldova <a href=\"https:\/\/www.privesc.eu\/Arhiva\/90574\/Presedintele-Raspunde--episodul-18\">a declarat \u00een cadrul unei emisiuni<\/a> (minutul 3:02) c\u0103 a discutat cu dl Vladimir \u021aURCAN, pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, detalii cu privire la decizia Cur\u021bii din 9 aprilie 2020. Pre\u0219edintele Igor DODON a declarat c\u0103 a cerut detalii Pre\u0219edintelui Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu privire la acest caz, iar ultimul ar fi r\u0103spuns c\u0103 patru judec\u0103tori constitu\u021bionali ar fi votat pentru decizia respectiv\u0103, iar d\u00e2nsul ar fi formulat o opinie separat\u0103 \u0219i c\u0103 ar fi adus argumente c\u0103 legea contestat\u0103 este constitu\u021bional\u0103. \u00cen textul <a href=\"http:\/\/constcourt.md\/ccdocview.php?tip=decizii&#038;docid=783&#038;l=ro\">deciziei din 9 aprilie 2020<\/a> nu se face vreo men\u021biune despre cum au votat judec\u0103torii Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale sau existen\u021ba opiniei separate. La \u00eenceputul \u0219edin\u021bei de ast\u0103zi, f\u0103c\u00e2nd referin\u021b\u0103 la unele reac\u021bii \u00een spa\u021biul public cu privire la decizia din 9 aprilie 2020, Pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a anun\u021bat despre ab\u021binerea sa de la examinarea sesiz\u0103rilor sus-men\u021bionate. Plenul Cur\u021bii a admis declara\u021bia de ab\u021binere a judec\u0103torului Vladimir \u021aURCAN \u0219i respectiv \u0219edin\u021ba Cur\u021bii a continuat \u00een lipsa acestuia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen context, este regretabil c\u0103 Pre\u0219edintele Republicii Moldova Igor DODON folose\u0219te atribu\u021biile prev\u0103zute de Constitu\u021bie pentru a discuta cu Pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu privire la cauzele care sunt \u00een examinare, iar Pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale accept\u0103 s\u0103 informeze Pre\u0219edintele Republicii Moldova despre acestea \u0219i s\u0103 justifice pentru ac\u021biunile pe care le-a luat. Astfel de ac\u021biuni, coroborat cu <a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/numirea-netransparenta-a-doi-judecatori-constitutionali-de-catre-parlament-submineaza-in-continuare-increderea-publica-in-independenta-curtii-constitutionale\/\">suspiciunile de numire pe criterii politice a unor judec\u0103tori ai Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale<\/a>, sunt contrare prevederilor legale \u0219i \u0219tirbesc din imaginea \u0219i \u00eencrederea \u00een activitatea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale. Comunicarea judec\u0103torilor constitu\u021bionali cu p\u0103r\u021bile \u0219i al\u021bi actori interesa\u021bi privind cauzele pendinte este inadmisibil\u0103 \u00een orice stat democratic, constituind o ingerin\u021b\u0103 \u00een activitatea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale. Mai mult, \u00een cazul judec\u0103torilor obi\u0219nui\u021bi, \u00een Republica Moldova un astfel de comportament poate duce chiar \u0219i la demiterea magistratului.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Organiza\u021biile semnatare solicit\u0103:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Pre\u0219edintelui Republicii Moldova s\u0103 \u00eenceteze orice ac\u021biune de subminare a independen\u021bei Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, precum \u0219i orice ingerin\u021b\u0103 \u00een activitatea \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi.<\/li>\n<li>Plenului Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale s\u0103 ia o decizie cu privire la aceast\u0103 situa\u021bie \u0219i s\u0103 adopte m\u0103surile care se impun pentru a preveni situa\u021bii similare pe viitor.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Organiza\u021bii semnatare:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM),<\/li>\n<li>Institutul de Politici \u0219i Reforme Europene (IPRE),<\/li>\n<li>Asocia\u021bia Promo-Lex,<\/li>\n<li>Comunitatea \u201eWatchDog.MD\u201d,<\/li>\n<li>Transparency International Moldova (TI-Moldova),<\/li>\n<li>Centrul de Politici \u0219i Reforme (CPR),<\/li>\n<li>Asocia\u021bia pentru Democra\u021bie Participativ\u0103 (ADEPT),<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"logo-img\">Asocia\u021bia pentru Guvernare Eficient\u0103 \u0219i Responsabil\u0103 (AGER),<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>Institutul de Istorie Oral\u0103 din Moldova (IIOM).\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Apelul public \u00een limba rom\u00e2n\u0103 este disponibil <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/2020-04-13-declar-ConstCourt-vs-presedint.pdf\">AICI<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Apelul public \u00een limba englez\u0103 este disponibil <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/EN-2020-04-13-declar-ConstCourt-vs-president.pdf\">AICI<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 1px solid #CCC; border-width: 1px; margin-bottom: 5px; max-width: 100%;\" src=\"\/\/www.slideshare.net\/slideshow\/embed_code\/key\/eUXJF0HBEYDGqt\" width=\"668\" height=\"714\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"> <\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Organiza\u021biile societ\u0103\u021bii civile regret\u0103 discu\u021biile pre\u0219edintelui Republicii Moldova cu pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale cu privire la o cauz\u0103 examinat\u0103 de Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103. De asemenea, suntem \u00eengrijora\u021bi c\u0103 pre\u0219edintele Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a \u00eencercat s\u0103 se justifice \u00een fa\u021ba pre\u0219edintelui \u021b\u0103rii \u0219i \u0219i-a exprimat opinia cu privire la cauza examinat\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 la emiterea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii Cur\u021bii. Un asemenea comportament [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":20427,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[212,269,270],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20426"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20426"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20480,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20426\/revisions\/20480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}