{"id":19618,"date":"2020-01-24T11:10:18","date_gmt":"2020-01-24T09:10:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=19618"},"modified":"2020-04-15T15:49:47","modified_gmt":"2020-04-15T12:49:47","slug":"mai-mult-de-jumatate-din-hotararile-judecatoresti-sunt-depersonalizate-defectuos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/mai-mult-de-jumatate-din-hotararile-judecatoresti-sunt-depersonalizate-defectuos\/","title":{"rendered":"Mai mult de jum\u0103tate din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile judec\u0103tore\u0219ti sunt depersonalizate defectuos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Depersonalizarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti \u00een Republica Moldova este efectuat\u0103 defectuos sau inconsecvent \u00een 63% din cauzele civile, contraven\u021bionale \u0219i penale generale, \u0219i \u00een 55% \u00een hot\u0103r\u00e2rile \u00een cauze de corup\u021bie. La aceast\u0103 concluzie au ajuns exper\u021bii Centrului de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM dup\u0103 analiza a 1,340 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti pronun\u021bate \u00eentre 1 ianuarie 2018 &#8211; 31 martie 2019). Datele au fost f\u0103cute publice \u00een cadrul evenimentului de prezentare a analizei \u201eTransparen\u021ba justi\u021biei versus datele cu caracter personal &#8211; O analiz\u0103 a modului de publicare a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti \u00een Republica Moldova\u201d, la 24 ianuarie 2020.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Potrivit legii, p\u00e2n\u0103 a fi publicate, anumite informa\u021bii din hot\u0103r\u00e2re trebuie excluse din con\u021binutul unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti. Judec\u0103torul este cel care trebuie s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 dac\u0103 anumite informa\u021bii din hot\u0103r\u00e2re pot afecta serios intimitatea p\u0103r\u021bilor sau afecta anumite interese \u0219i, \u00een consecin\u021b\u0103, s\u0103 anonimizeze anumite p\u0103r\u021bi sau chiar \u00eentreaga hot\u0103r\u00e2re. Regulile privind anonimizarea sunt stabilite \u00eentr-un Regulament CSM aprobat \u00een luna octombrie 2017.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Autorii analizei au stabilit c\u0103, de cele mai multe ori, nu sunt respectate prevederile care prev\u0103d obliga\u021bia ascunderii, adresei de domiciliu, a datei \u0219i locului na\u0219terii, a IDNP-ului sau num\u0103rului de \u00eenmatriculare al automobilului (\u00een cel pu\u021bin 305 (38%) hot\u0103r\u00e2ri din cele analizate). Totodat\u0103, sunt depersonalizate abuziv numele inculpa\u021bilor, autorilor sau instigatorilor acolo unde acestea nu trebuie depersonalizate (\u00een 179 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile penale \u0219i contraven\u021bionale analizate (34%)). La fel, sunt anonimizate abuziv numele avocatului, procurorului, sau agentului constatator , O alt\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lcare este depersonalizarea par\u021bial\u0103 a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u2013 c\u00e2nd datele sunt depersonalizate doar \u00eentr-o parte a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u00een 172 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti (21% din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile analizate).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Potrivit analizei, aplicarea defectuoas\u0103 a depersonaliz\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti este o problem\u0103 sistemic\u0103. <strong>\u00cen cazul judec\u0103toriilor,<\/strong> rata medie a \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii Regulamentului este de 75%, iar \u00een unele judec\u0103torii aceasta dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te 90%. La nivelul <strong>cur\u021bilor de apel<\/strong>, situa\u021bia este mai bun\u0103 dec\u00e2t \u00een judec\u0103torii, dar la fel de \u00eengrijor\u0103toare: 47% din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile judec\u0103tore\u0219ti nu corespund Regulamentului CSM. La <strong>CSJ<\/strong>, prevederile Regulamentului nu au fost respectate \u00een 23% din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile analizate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Autorii analizei subliniaz\u0103 c\u0103 modul incorect de depersonalizare a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti afecteaz\u0103 via\u021ba privat\u0103 a persoanelor fizice care compar \u00een instan\u021bele de judecat\u0103, dar \u0219i erodeaz\u0103 \u00eencrederea \u00een sistemul judec\u0103toresc, dac\u0103 anumite informa\u021bii publice lipsesc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Autorii recomand\u0103 autorit\u0103\u021bilor responsabile clarificarea prevederilor problematice din Regulamentul CSM, precum \u0219i m\u0103suri urgente de consolidare sau \u201ere\u00eemprosp\u0103tare\u201d a cuno\u0219tin\u021belor corpului judec\u0103toresc \u0219i ale asisten\u021bilor judiciari ce \u021bin de \u00een\u021belegerea \u0219i aplicarea prevederilor Regulamentului. Totodat\u0103, institu\u021biile competente precum CSM \u0219i Agen\u021bia de administrare a instan\u021belor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti\u00a0 trebuie s\u0103 continue s\u0103 asigure mai eficient monitorizarea respect\u0103rii prevederilor privind publicarea \u0219i depersonalizarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/Transparenta-just-vs-date-caract-pers.pdf\"><strong>Cite\u0219te documentul AICI.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 1px solid #CCC; border-width: 1px; margin-bottom: 5px; max-width: 100%;\" src=\"\/\/www.slideshare.net\/slideshow\/embed_code\/key\/ubCKubia3nhAXK\" width=\"668\" height=\"714\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"> <\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Documentul analitic \u201eTransparen\u021ba justi\u021biei versus datele cu caracter personal. O analiz\u0103 a modului de publicare a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti \u00een Republica Moldova\u201d, a fost elaborat \u00een cadrul proiectului \u201e<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/promovarea-suprematiei-legii-prin-monitorizare-de-catre-societatea-civila\/\"><em>Promovarea suprema\u021biei legii prin monitorizare de c\u0103tre societatea civil\u0103<\/em><\/a><em>\u201d, implementat de CRJM cu suportul Agen\u021biei SUA pentru Dezvoltare Interna\u021bional\u0103 (USAID).<\/em> <em>Opiniile exprimate apar\u021bin CRJM \u015fi nu reflect\u0103 \u00een mod necesar pozi\u021bia USAID sau a Guvernului SUA. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/\/www.privesc.eu\/widget\/live\/89765?\" width=\"480\" height=\"270\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Depersonalizarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti \u00een Republica Moldova este efectuat\u0103 defectuos sau inconsecvent \u00een 63% din cauzele civile, contraven\u021bionale \u0219i penale generale, \u0219i \u00een 55% \u00een hot\u0103r\u00e2rile \u00een cauze de corup\u021bie. La aceast\u0103 concluzie au ajuns exper\u021bii Centrului de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM dup\u0103 analiza a 1,340 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti pronun\u021bate \u00eentre 1 ianuarie 2018 &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":19628,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[177,152,181,179,180,178],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19618"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19618"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20476,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19618\/revisions\/20476"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}