{"id":14498,"date":"2018-03-01T11:26:00","date_gmt":"2018-03-01T08:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=14498"},"modified":"2019-02-27T17:51:12","modified_gmt":"2019-02-27T15:51:12","slug":"sinteza-violarilor-constatate-de-ctedo-in-privinta-republicii-moldova-pana-la-31-decembrie-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/sinteza-violarilor-constatate-de-ctedo-in-privinta-republicii-moldova-pana-la-31-decembrie-2017\/","title":{"rendered":"CRJM a sintetizat viol\u0103rile constatate de CtEDO \u00een privin\u021ba Republicii Moldova, din 1997 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Din 12 septembrie 1997, Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului (CtEDO) poate examina cererile depuse \u00eempotriva Republicii Moldova. P\u00e2n\u0103 la 31 decembrie 2017, CtEDO a pronun\u021bat 354 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti, \u00een care a constatat 503 viol\u0103ri ale drepturilor omului.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen scopul sporirii nivelului de informare al speciali\u0219tilor despre activitatea CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti, facilitarea aplic\u0103rii standardelor CtEDO la nivel na\u021bional, precum \u0219i pentru a preveni viol\u0103ri similare, Centrul de Resurse Juridice din Moldova (CRJM) a sintetizat viol\u0103rile constatate de CtEDO \u00een privin\u021ba Republicii Moldova p\u00e2n\u0103 la 31 decembrie 2017.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cele mai des \u00eenc\u0103lcate drepturi sunt:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>dreptul la un proces echitabil (Art.6 CEDO) &#8211; 156 de viol\u0103ri (31%);<\/li>\n<li>interzicerea torturii (Art.3 CEDO) &#8211; 125 de viol\u0103ri (24.8%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la libertate \u015fi siguran\u021b\u0103 (Art. 5 CEDO) &#8211; 72 de viol\u0103ri (14.3%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la un recurs efectiv (Art. 13 CEDO) &#8211; 52 de viol\u0103ri (10.3%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la respectarea vie\u021bii private \u0219i de familie (Art. 8 CEDO) &#8211; 23 de viol\u0103ri (4.6%);<\/li>\n<li>dreptul la libertatea de exprimare (Art. 10 CEDO) &#8211; 17 viol\u0103ri (3.4%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cele mai des \u00eent\u00e2lnite tipuri de viol\u0103ri sunt:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Neexecutarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti &#8211; 63 de viol\u0103ri (12.5%);<\/li>\n<li>Investigarea defectuoas\u0103 a maltrat\u0103rii \u0219i deceselor \u2013 42 de viol\u0103ri (8.4%);<\/li>\n<li>Deten\u021bia \u00een condi\u021bii proaste &#8211; 39 de viol\u0103ri (7.8%);<\/li>\n<li>Casarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti irevocabile prin recurs \u00een anulare sau aplicarea neregulamentar\u0103 a revizuirii &#8211; 31 de viol\u0103ri (6.2%);<\/li>\n<li>Maltratarea \u2013 28 de viol\u0103ri (5.6%);<\/li>\n<li>Motivarea insuficient\u0103 a arest\u0103rii &#8211; 21 de viol\u0103ri (4.2%).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sinteza a fost elaborat\u0103 \u00een baza studierii jurispruden\u021bei CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti disponibile pe <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng#{\"documentcollectionid2\":[\"GRANDCHAMBER\",\"CHAMBER\"]}\"><u>pagina web a CtEDO<\/u><\/a>. Viol\u0103rile au fost sistematizate sub form\u0103 de tabel, dup\u0103 articole \u0219i tipuri de viol\u0103ri. \u00cen tabel, la fiecare categorie, sunt men\u021bionate toate hot\u0103r\u00e2rile \u00een care a fost constatat\u0103 o violare de acel tip.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Violari-20-de-ani.pdf\">Sinteza integral\u0103 a viol\u0103rilor constatate de CtEDO \u00een privin\u021ba Republicii Moldova, din 1997 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een 2017, disponibil\u0103 aici.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cencep\u00e2nd cu 2010, CRJM a analizat activitatea CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti pentru fiecare an separat:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/raport.activ_.ctedo_.2010.28.01.2011.pdf\">2010<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/04\/raport.activ_.ctedo_.2011.fin_1.pdf\">2011<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Raport.activ_.ctedo_.2012.20.02.2013-11.pdf\">2012<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/Hot-CtEDO-2013.pdf\">2013<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/05-Nota-Analitica-Ianuarie-2015.pdf\">2014<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/CRJM-NA-CtEDO-2015.pdf\">2015<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/NA-CRJM-CtEDO-2016-ro-final-web-1.pdf\">2016<\/a>\u00a0\u0219i <a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/CRJM-NA-Activitatea-CtEDO-2017.pdf\">2017<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Din 12 septembrie 1997, Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului (CtEDO) poate examina cererile depuse \u00eempotriva Republicii Moldova. P\u00e2n\u0103 la 31 decembrie 2017, CtEDO a pronun\u021bat 354 de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti, \u00een care a constatat 503 viol\u0103ri ale drepturilor omului. \u00cen scopul sporirii nivelului de informare al speciali\u0219tilor despre activitatea CtEDO \u00een cauzele moldovene\u0219ti, facilitarea [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":14504,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,1],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14498"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14498"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17255,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14498\/revisions\/17255"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}