{"id":8505,"date":"2016-12-19T13:07:43","date_gmt":"2016-12-19T11:07:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crjm.org\/?p=8505"},"modified":"2020-05-19T12:02:22","modified_gmt":"2020-05-19T09:02:22","slug":"amnistia-fiscala-si-de-capital-republica-moldova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/amnistia-fiscala-si-de-capital-republica-moldova\/","title":{"rendered":"Ini\u021biativa legislativ\u0103 privind amnistia fiscal\u0103 \u015fi de capital comport\u0103 mari riscuri de cre\u0219tere a corup\u021biei, sp\u0103l\u0103rii banilor \u0219i evaziunii fiscale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>The Independent Analytical Center &#8220;Expert-Grup&#8221; and the Legal Resources Centre from Moldova launch today, 19 December 2016, a Position Note on the legislative initiative related to tax and capital amnesty. This note is being supported by a group of non-commercial organizations and unaffiliated experts. It comes as a reaction to the approval in the first reading of the draft law on the liberalisation of capital and fiscal incentive (draft law no. 452) and the draft law on amendment of certain legislative acts (draft law no. 451) &#8211; both approved in unprecedented haste and with violation of legal norms related to transparency in decision-making and drafting of legislative acts.<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to experts, the proposed capital amnesty could lead to legalisation of previously committed acts of corruption and perpetuation of corrupt state servants, which is at odds with the objectives set forth for fighting corruption (especially grand corruption), as the relevant state institutions will not be able to verify the origin of the declared assets. This compromises the entire reform of the system of verification and ensuring integrity in the public sector.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main risks of these draft laws approval encounter: <b>a higher risk of tax evasion<\/b> by increasing tax evasion benefits, lowering costs and probability of detection as the beneficiaries of capital amnesty will not be investigated. <b>The risk of increasing corruption and money laundering<\/b> by prohibiting verification of the origin of the declared assets, <b>the reputation risk of the banking sector<\/b>, already tainted following the bank frauds and high scale and internationally resonant money laundering cases, as well as the <b>risk of worsening relations with development partners<\/b>, by undermining the rule of law, the efforts to ensure integrity in the public sector and the banking system reform \u2013 all \u00a0key prerequisites for the budget support from the main development partners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>In this context, the experts propose withdrawal of draft laws no. 451 and no. 452<\/b> and launching of a comprehensive reform to diminish the informal economy. According to experts, it should aim to be much more fundamental and efficient than the proposed amnesty, including:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2022 Development of electronic payments and discouraging of cash use;<br \/>\n\u2022 Improving tax administration and further development of a new Tax Code in line with international best practices;<br \/>\n\u2022 Increase fines, along with state authorities\u2019 ability to detect tax evasion cases, informal employment or remuneration; eventually expanding penalties for informal employment and employees;<br \/>\n\u2022 Revision of tax rates for possible adjustments to boost tax compliance benefits and minimize tax evasion;<br \/>\n\u2022 Increase the level of information and awareness of the risks of tax evasion and informal employment;<br \/>\n\u2022 Enhancing efficiency, transparency and sustainability of the pension system;<br \/>\n\u2022 Increase transparency related to the issuance of permissive documents for companies and minimizing the public officials\u2019 discretion to this end;<br \/>\n\u2022 Reforming the mechanisms for exercising state control by reducing their number, along with improving their efficiency and targeting;<br \/>\n\u2022 Other relevant actions in line with international best practices in this area.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/2016-12-19-NP_Amnistia-fisc-capital_FINAL1.pdf\">Position Note is available here in Romanian.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/2016-12-19-NP_Amnistia-fisc-capital_FINAL_en.pdf\">Position Note is available here in English.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/2016-12-19-NP_Amnistia-fisc-capital_FINAL_ru.pdf\">Position Note is available here in Russian.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Signatories (the list is open ):<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Independent Think Tank Expert-Grup;<\/li>\n<li>Legal Resources Centre from Moldova (LCRM);<\/li>\n<li>Centrul de Analiz\u0103 \u0219i Pevenire a Corup\u021biei;<\/li>\n<li>Association for Efficient and Responsible Governance;<\/li>\n<li>Transparency International &#8211; Moldova;<\/li>\n<li>Association for Participatory\u00a0Democracy;<\/li>\n<li>Institutul pentru Politici \u0219i Reforme Europene (IPRE);<\/li>\n<li>Veaceslav NEGRU\u021a\u0102;<\/li>\n<li>Alexei BUZU;<\/li>\n<li>Ion PREA\u0218CA;<\/li>\n<li>Dumitru VICOL;<\/li>\n<li>Sergiu TOFILAT;<\/li>\n<li>Alexandru ZGARDAN;<\/li>\n<li>Stat MADAN;<\/li>\n<li>Sergiu UNGUREANU;<\/li>\n<li>Alexandru FALA;<\/li>\n<li>Dumitru ALAIBA;<\/li>\n<li>Anticorruption Alliance.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">***In the same time several NGOs from Romania launch a petition where they demand that the international partners of the country consider firm measures, including <b>stopping the budgetary support and all other forms of financial assistance to Moldova,<\/b> if the Parliament in Chisinau adopts the so-called law for \u201ccapital liberalization and fiscal stimulation\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/old2.old.crjm.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/2016-12-19-Petition-romanian-ngos-moldova-amnesty.pdf\">Petition of Romanian NGOs is available here.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Contact persons:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><i>1. The Independent Analytical Center &#8220;Expert-Grup&#8221; \u2013 Adrian LUPU\u0218OR (<\/i><a href=\"mailto:adrian@expert-grup.org\"><i>adrian@expert-grup.org<\/i><\/a><i>);<\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><i>2. The Legal Resources Centre from Moldova \u2013 Nadejda HRIPTIEVSCHI (<\/i><a href=\"mailto:nadejda.hriptievschi@old2.old.crjm.org\"><i>nadejda.hriptievschi@old2.old.crjm.org<\/i><\/a><i>); Vladislav GRIBINCEA (<\/i><a href=\"mailto:vladislav.gribincea@old2.old.crjm.org\"><i>vladislav.gribincea@old2.old.crjm.org<\/i><\/a><i>).<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Independent Analytical Center &#8220;Expert-Grup&#8221; and the Legal Resources Centre from Moldova launch today, 19 December 2016, a Position Note on the legislative initiative related to tax and capital amnesty. This note is being supported by a group of non-commercial organizations and unaffiliated experts. It comes as a reaction to the approval in the first [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8507,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8505"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8505"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8505\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20880,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8505\/revisions\/20880"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.crjm.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}